Beaneball

Thursday, August 11. 2005

Stark article on cheating at ESPN

Jayson Stark has penned one of the better articles about steroids I've seen from the mainstream media over at ESPN. It is, as usual for Stark, a bit unfocused, and it doesn't really answer any questions, but it certainly asks a few. Most importantly, "Why do we only seem to care about hitters who cheat?" and "Why do we only care about the sanctity of records? What about seasons and games and World Series results?" I'm glad there's somebody at a major media outlet who's not just caught up in the "by God, he cheated, so boot his ass out!" hysteria.

Wednesday, August 10. 2005

Liveblogging the Yankees

Seeing as how I've got a laptop now (I wanted one for law school) and a wireless internet connection (a wireless router was available for a discount with the computer) and a couch (we moved and we actually have a living room; the couch was found at a discount furniture store that was closing, so we got it on deep discount), I can sit here and write about the game as I'm watching it. Neat! That said, some of you might not find the prospect of a Yankees - White Sox matchup all that scintillating, so I'll put the rest of this below a "More" tag. 7:17: Some controversy already, as Derek Jeter may or may not have beat Scott Posednik to second base on a hit-and-run groundball by Iguchi up the middle. Podsednik was called out and argued vehemently. Ozzie Guillen came out to argue, but didn't seem to stay long; it seemed to be more the case where the manager comes out to take over the argument and make sure his player doesn't get thrown out. On the question of whether or not he was out, I think he actually was, and it looks like the umpire, Jerry Meals, really had the perfect angle on the play (which is why he's positioned there, isn't it?). Well done, Jerry. 7:22: Robinson Cano just stung a single to left field past Joe Crede at third. Cano, though he draws comparisons to Rod Carew from the YES network crew, is likely to be a very overrated player if he continues in this mold: .287/.313/.443. He's got nice power already, particularly for a second baseman, but he's a classic outmaker despite an above-mean batting average. With his power and contact hitting, I guess you'd want him somewhere down in the lineup, behind the real on-base threats, maybe fifth or sixth. The higher in the lineup you bat him, though, the more outs you'll give away. Cano, by the way, is 19th in baseball in VORP for a rookie, with eleven of those players in the American League. By VORP, the AL Rookie of the Year right now is Gustavo Chacin in Toronto. 7:33: The shift put on by the Yankees against Paul Konerko makes me wonder why it seems that the shift is only ever put on against lefties (with the obvious exception of the righty-hitting Konerko). 7:34: You know your offense is in trouble when Timo Perez is your DH. Perez enters this game with a .285 on-base percentage. As good as the White Sox have been this year, their adjusted record is significantly worse than their real record and their pretty bad-looking offense makes them seem vulnerable to the other good-pitching teams they'll meet in the playoffs. In other words, if the A's end up playing them in the post-season (assuming they make it, of course), I wouldn't necessarily be scared of them, gaudy record or not. 7:42: The YES guys are talking about "records that won't be broken" and cite Joe DiMaggio's hitting streak and Orel Hershiser's scoreless innings. Someone, probably Jim Kaat, said, "The records that are being broken today are home runs and saves" and mentioned "trends in the game." What people seem to not realize is that a better description of these "trends" is "cycles." Have they forgotten the speedy, slap-hitting '80's already? The styles in the game go back and forth as new ideas are tried, as the culture changes, as technology changes, and so on. The obvious recent cultural change, if I can call it that, is a crackdown on performance-enhancing drugs. 8:17: We're in some doldrums and my attention is waning. Iguchi hit a home run last half inning and the Yankees are threatening to tie the game now, but my focus is elsewhere. 8:21: Jose Contreras just got really lucky and saved a run. Jorge Posada grounded a ball hard up the middle. Contreras had no hope of getting a glove on the ball, but he managed to get a foot up and, of all places the ball could go, it went directly to his first baseman, Paul Konerko. The fielder picked up the ball and tagged out Posada, ending the inning. We'll see if that run is as important as one run would have been last night. 8:40: Well, this was essentially a disaster. I got bored and otherwise occupied. I'm leaving the game on, but I'm done with this post. It was a nice experiment.

Friday, August 5. 2005

The Law Firm; Episode 2

On last night's episode of The Law Firm, we saw Anika and Elizabeth's dismissals. Anika's firing was completely predictable, as she'd done a poor job two weeks in a row, capped this week by deviating from the strategy her teammates had laid out for their trial. Elizabeth was a bit of a surprise. I wouldn't call it unjustified, since Roy Black correctly criticized her effort to prepare their witness for cross-examination. In light of Olivier's utterance of "Bullshit" in response to losing his case, though, as well as the willful misdirect perpetrated by Black at the dismissal ceremony, I may have gasped a little bit when Black said Elizabeth's name. As regards Olivier, I think Black likes his style; had it been Deep or Chris blowing up like that after losing, they would have been fired. Both of them are quieter types than Olivier, and I don't think Black sees much potential for great trial attorneys in quiet types, though from what we've seen of both Deep and Chris, they're certainly capable. Meanwhile, what was up with the judge in the arbitration (the dominatrix case)? Did he seriously ask to see the website? I could see why Olivier got a little upset, because (though I acknowledge how little of the actual proceedings we see due to editing) the judge seemed way more interested in the website than in the legal matters of what contract the two parties may have had between them. I'm curious to hear from some of the actual lawyers out there what they thought of this particular case, though the facts available to us are certainly scant.